9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 830X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , for the Respondent. ORDER Heard both sides on the preliminary objection raised by the Department that the appeal is time barred and there is no application for condonation of delay filed by the appellant. 2. The present dispute relates to the demand of duty relating to the period 1995-96 to 1998-99 initiated by a show cause notice dated 7-8-2000. According to the appellant, they had informed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... requests on several occasion for serving copy of the order-in-original and only after filing an application under RTI Act, they received a copy of the order-in-original (which is against them) only on 24-5-08 and they have filed the appeal on 20-8-08 and, therefore, the appeal has been filed on time. 3 Learned DR submitted detailed dates and events relating to the correspondence between the Depar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... imations were being sent to office address at Greater Kailash as well as to the address of Consultant. It appears that the order-in-original dated 28-2-06 has not been endorsed to the consultant and he also claims that he has not received the same. Further, we notice that the letters dated 31-5-06, 13-9-06 and 8-12-06 by the Superintendent were addressed to the erstwhile factory address at Faridab ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
