9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (7) TMI 751X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e order. Same has not been done - delay cannot be condoned - application for condonation of delay is dismissed - C/103/2011 - M/224/2012/CSTB/C-I - Dated:- 20-2-2012 - Ashok Jindal, P R Chandrasekharan, JJ. For Appellant: Shri A K Prabhakar, Superintendent (AR) For Respondent: Shri S S Sekhon, Adv. Per: Ashok Jindal: Revenue has filed this appeal along with application for stay a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... having the jurisdiction to review the impugned order. An appeal was preferred on the basis of the above and the said recommendation of the Committee of Commissioners before this Tribnunal and the said appeal was dismissed by this Tribunal vide order dated 15/11/2010 holding that the appeal is not maintainable. Thereafter, the jurisdictional Committee of Commissioners reviewed the impugned order, w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... shall be filed within 3 months from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated to the Commissioner of Customs or, as the case may be, to the other party preferring the appeal. Undoubtedly, in this case, the impugned order was passed on 18/12/2008 and the said order has to be reviewed by the Commissioners of Customs within 90 days from the communication of the order. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
