2012 (11) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e appellant seeks 'ad interim stay' of recovery of an amount of Rs.3,70,927/- quantified by the Central Excise Range Superintendent and intimated to the appellant in a letter dt. 04/05/2011. The Superintendent appears to have worked out this demand in terms of the impugned order. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that the demand so re-quantified is also unsustainable in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sioner in this case) to quantify the revised demand. In this case, however, this did not happen. The Range Superintendent appears to have, on his own accord, done the exercise of requantification of duty. The aforesaid letter was issued to demand such duty. After considering all aspects of this case, we are of the view that the demand worked out by the Superintendent without concurrence of the ori .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X