2013 (2) TMI 593

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... S. Kang: Heard both sides. 2. The applicant filed this application for condoning the delay of 100 days in filing the appeal. The applicant filed this appeal on 23rd August 2012 against the impugned order passed on 15th February 2012. 3. The contention of the applicant is that the impugned order was received by one of their employees, Shri Prakash N,Murudkar, Accounts Executive, The Accounts Exe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... w that what action has been taken against the employee for the negligence. 6. The Tribunal can condone the delay in filing the appeal on showing sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the normal period of limitation. Negligence of employee cannot be considered as sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the normal period. Therefore, we find no merit in the application and the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X