Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (7) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s.80HHC of the Act for export of marble blocks, which were cut and polished - appellant-Revenue has also not controverted that the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal on facts are not correct or are perverse - Following the decision of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Arihant Tiles & Minerals (P) Ltd. & Ors. [2013 (6) TMI 45 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] and Sudarshan Silks & Sarees Versus Commiss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Learned counsel for appellant fairly and frankly conceded that similar appeal of the department against same assessee i.e. D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.13/2008 on the same point, which is involved in the present case, has already been dismissed by this Court on 17th May, 2013 along with D.B. Income Tax Appeal Nos.170/2008 and 124/2008. He further submitted that present case is fully covered by above .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and polished. These findings are, indisputably, binding on this Court in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sudarshan Silks Sarees (supra). The appellant-Revenue has also not controverted that the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal on facts are not correct or are perverse. Therefore, the findings of facts arrived at by the learned Tribunal need not be gone int .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ular does not adversely affect claims of the assessee-respondents and the assessees are entitled to benefit of deduction under s.80HHC of the Act. Thus, the second substantial question of law framed in Appeal No. 29 of 2008 is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee-respondent and against the appellant-Revenue. 25. In view of the above, these appeals of the Revenue are hereby dismissed. N .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates