9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 271X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the impugned order of the Government of India 24th June, 2011 whereby the rebate claimed by the petitioner has been rejected. 2. The Government of India in its order has recorded that on the date on which the personal hearing was scheduled, neither the petitioner nor anybody on behalf of the petitioner was present nor any request made for adjournment of the case. 3. The petitioner has annex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the impugned order passed by the Government of India on 24th June, 2011 is an ex parte order and in view of the fact that the Government of India has not considered its order dated 3rd May, 2011 in the present case, in our opinion, it would be just and proper to set aside the impugned order dated 24th June, 2011 passed by the Government of India and direct the Joint Secretary to the Government of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
