TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 682X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... icant has filed this application for restoration of appeal No. S/55/2007 which was dismissed vide Final Order No. 481/2008 dated 15.5.2008, for the reason that being a PSU the appellants are required to produce the clearance from the Committee on Disputes for pursuing their appeal remedy and they had not produced such clearance. 2. Now the applicant has filed this application for restoration of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation was found pending and not in a case where the Committee had considered the application and refused. This is a case where the Committee had considered the application and has refused appeal remedy and therefore, we do not find any merit in the application for restoration of appeal. Therefore, the same is rejected.
(Dictated and pronounced in open Court) X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|