2013 (12) TMI 1298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Das, Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Revenue has filed this miscellaneous application to amend the cause title of their appeal by incorporating the names of 37 importers/transfers as respondents, whose names are mentioned herein as under :- 1.     Punit Impex 2.     Tex Fab Corporation 3.     Sunflag Filament Ltd. 4.&nb .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ms India 22.   Satidham Industries Ltd. 23.   S. Kumar Synfabs Ltd. 24.   Vivilon Textiles India Pvt. Ltd. 25.   Asia Polytex (I) Ltd. 26.   Agarwal Brothers 27.   Pelican Syntex Ltd. 28.   Aupam Traders Filaments Ltd. 29.   Auxi Dye Chem 30.   Associated Chemical Corporation 31.   Ramgopa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... & Allied Industries reported in 2008 (232) E.L.T. 649 (Tri.-Del.) = 2010 (18) S.T.R. 379 (Tribunal), CCE, Daman v. Shree Sainath Fabrics Industries Ltd. reported in 2003 (158) E.L.T. 218 (Tri.-Del.) and CCE, Bangalore v. N.A. Jayaram reported in 2003 (161) E.L.T. 412. 3. On behalf of one of the respondents, namely, Shri Ramgopal Textile Ltd., Shri S.S. Sekhon, ld. Counsel submitted that the appli .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... April, 2008 and they have made this application in November, 2010. The case laws relied upon by the ld. DR are not relevant to the facts of the case as in those cases, a composite appeal was filed against all the respondents, but in this case no appeal has been filed against the intended respondents, which are intended to be impleaded as respondents. Moreover, the case laws cited by the ld. Advoc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X