Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (7) TMI 630

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the revisionary order (common in all the three writs) dated January 29, 2004, passed in Revision No. 53/2003/State/Indore and Revision No. 21/2003/Central/Indore (annexure P18) by the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Indore, which in its turn arise out of the respective assessment years as mentioned in the respective assessment orders. The petitioner (a dealer) is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of what is called--steel tubes, having their unit at Dewas and office at Indore. They also claim to have several branches all over India. On August 27, 1993, the flying squad of Commercial Tax Wing of State raided the business premises of the pe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax net but were held as inter-State sales. It is this finding which is sought to be impugned by the petitioner in these petitions. Notice of these writs was issued to the respondent. They are served and represented. Return has been filed, inter alia, justifying the impugned orders including the factual finding returned by the two authorities holding the transactions to be in the nature of inter-State sales and not a mere branch transfer. Heard Shri P.M. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri A.S. Kutumble, learned Additional Advocate-General with Shri M. Parwal, penal lawyer for the respondent-State. Placing reliance on the decision reported in the case of Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu [2004] 134 STC 473 (SC), .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... effected by the assessee is "inter-State sale" or "intra-State sale" or "branch transfer" involving no element of sale is question of fact and needs to be decided on the basis of documents/material available on record. If on the basis of material available, i.e., filed by the parties or seized by the department in raid, a factual conclusion can be drawn in regard to its nature, then such finding of fact cannot be disturbed by a writ court though challenged by the assessee on facts. Coming to the facts of this case, it is not in dispute that several incriminating documents which had been seized in clear terms revealed that the goods manufactured by the petitioner at their Dewas unit were meant for specific buye .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n forms to show branch transfer were not considered or that some material having been rejected by the revisionary authority in the earlier round of litigation, the same could not have been taken note of. In my considered view this submission is raised for mere argument sake involving no legal basis. Mere perusal of impugned revisionary order would indicate that each and every transaction in relation to each specific party was examined. That mentioned even the name of buyer. It is coupled with the admission of petitioner's witness--Mr. Mehta (R 1). What more clinching and conclusive evidence was required for recording a finding of concluded sale (inter-State) against the petitioner. The entire object of the inquiry is to find out the tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates