2014 (3) TMI 853

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mr. Vikas Jain and Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocates. ORDER The Revenue is aggrieved by an order of the Tribunal dated 22.03.2013. It is pointed out that in almost identical circumstances where the Court had dealt with similar orders that involves facts dealing with assessments relating to income derived on account of sale of jewellery, the Court had directed the ITAT, keeping in line with its previ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssee on this aspect on 3.12.2000. Counsel for the assessee argues that notice for appeal was received on 10.10.2008 in the present case. It is submitted that in these circumstances where the ITAT made its order on 16.10.2008, the time limit for filing cross objections had not expired. The assessee contends that the ITAT too should consider and pronounce upon the cross objections. This Court is of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X