2014 (10) TMI 478

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... v., Mr D H Nadkarni, Adv., Mr G B Yadav, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr Ahibaran, Addl. Comm. (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: P R Chandrasekharan: 1. There are four appeals and stay petitions filed against of order-in-original No.25/2012 dated 31/08/2012 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Export), Nhava Sheva. Vide the impugned the learned adjudicating authority has confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 2,98,49 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ow-cause notice dated 19/05/2005 and consequent adjudication proceedings leading to the impugned order. It is his submission that prior to issue of Notification No. 44/2011-Customs (NT) dated 06/07/2011 the DGCEI, Ahmedabad had no jurisdiction to issue show-cause notice in respect of imports which had taken place through various ports situated in Mumbai. He also relies on the decision of this Trib .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issioner (AR) appearing for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the authority. However, he fairly submits that Notification No. 44/2011-Customs (NT) dated 06/07/2011 has not been given any retrospective effect. However, it is his submission that vitiating of show-cause notice by itself could not lead to quashing of the impugned order and therefore, he pleads for putting the appellants to term. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X