9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (11) TMI 124X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... carried out by the appellant and having regard to the fact that appellants got to do only a portion of the contract entrusted to M/s. Ramkey Infrastructure Ltd., which is in reality a turnkey project, it cannot be said that the appellants have also executed an EPC project when they have undertaken this work. Prima facie, we feel that the appellant have a case on merits. Accordingly, in our opinio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 4-7-2011. The second demand is for ₹ 11,30,738/-. It is the claim of the appellant that they had executed the contract as a sub-contractor and the work was entrusted to them on back-to-back basis by M/s. Ramkey Infrastructure Ltd. who was the main contractor. The work executed by the appellant is construction of pump houses, storage tanks and distribution of water supply network. Revenue ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve undertaken this work. Prima facie, we feel that the appellant have a case on merits. Accordingly, in our opinion, the amount already deposited by the appellant is sufficient for hearing the appeal and accordingly there shall be waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery of balance dues during the pendency of appeal. (Operative portion of this order was pronounced in open Court on conclu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
