2015 (3) TMI 863

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tries Ltd. Khopoli against' the orders-in-appeal  No. US/210/RGD/2011 dated 18.08.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise  (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-II, Mumbai. 2.  Brief facts of the case are that in this case original authority sanctioned the rebate claim of Rs. 57,684/-. Department filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that rebate claim the tune of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... partment appeal and thereby disallowed rebate claim of Rs. 3,624/-. 3.  Being aggrieved by the impugned order-in-appeal, the applicant has filed this revision application under Section 35 EE of Central Excise Act, 1944 before Central Government various grounds. 4.  Personal hearing scheduled in this case on 08.08.2013 and 12.03.2014 was attended by Shri P.K. Shetty, Advocate, and Shri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assed under section 35 A where order is of the nature referred to in the first proviso to section 35B(1) annul or modify such order provided that Central Government in its discretion refuse to admit an application in respect of an order where amount of duty or fine or penalty determined by such order does not exceed five thousand rupees. In this case disputed rebate claim amount is only Rs. 3,624/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X