2006 (4) TMI 73

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tands admitted on the following substantial question of law: "Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue and, therefore, the Commissioner could not have revised the same under section 263 ?" 2. Exercising power, under section  263 of the Income-tax Act .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m during that year or does not sell the rights of exhibition of the film. In other words, if there is no exploitation by the assessee and if he does not sell the rights of exhibition of the film, then, no deduction shall be allowed in respect of the cost of acquisition of the film, in computing the profits and gains of the previous year, in which year, the feature film was acquired. However, the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsidered opinion, the Commissioner of Income-tax had arrived at such a conclusion only on the basis that the vendor of the film is the sister concern of the assessee. This cannot be a reason at all, in our considered opinion. Merely because the sale is by a concern to another concern, which is its sister concern, it would not necessarily follow that the sale is not genuine. There is no finding by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X