TMI Blog2017 (2) TMI 436X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondent-Revenue Per Dr. D.M. Misra: This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the Order-in-Original No. 29/Commr/2005 dated 19.12.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad III. 2. After hearing both sides for some time, we find that the issue relates to clearance of Vanaspati, both branded and unbranded, after introduction of levy of duty with effect from 01.3. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... davit denying the said fact. While looking into the records we find that the panchanamas, statements by the appellant are illegible and some of the statements are in vernacular language(Gujarati) and not translated ones leading to difficulty in considering the grounds raised in assailing the impugned order. Ld. A.R. for the Revenue also submits that for ascertaining the correctness of the claim ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|