Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (7) TMI 1730

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the employees. Under Chapter III of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the incomes not included in total income are specified, in which, the agricultural income and income received by an individual as a member of a Hindu undivided family are exempted and so many other exemptions are there. 3. Insofar as this case is concerned, Section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is relevant, which reads as under: "10(10C)- any amount received or receivable by an employee of - (i) a public sector company; or (ii) any other company; or (iii) an authority established under a Central, State or Provincial Act; or (iv) a local authority ; or (v) a co-operative society; or (vi) a University established or incorporated by or under a Central, St .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y other assessment year: Provided also that where any relief has been allowed to an assessee under section 89 for any assessment year in respect of any amount received or receivable on his voluntary retirement or termination of service or voluntary separation, no exemption under this clause shall be allowed to him in relation to such, or any other, assessment year." 4. Clause (viii) of Section 10(10C) specified a limit of Rs. 5,00,000/-. Rule 2BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 reads as under: "2BA. The amount received by an employee of- (i) a public sector company; or (ii) any other company; or (iii) an authority established under a Central, State or Provincial Act; or (iv) a local authority; or (v) a co-operative socie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tary separation has been drawn to result in overall reduction in the existing strength of the employees; (iv) the vacancy caused by the voluntary retirement or voluntary separation is not to be filled up; (v) the retiring employee of a company shall not be employed in another company or concern belonging to the same management; (vi) the amount receivable on account of voluntary retirement or voluntary separation of the employee does not exceed the amount equivalent to three months salary for each completed year of service or salary at the time of retirement multiplied by the balance months of service left before the date of his retirement on superannuation: Provided that requirement of (i) above would not be applicable in case o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ovisions of the Act." Against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, the Income Tax Department has not preferred any appeal and the judgment has attained finality. However, in the case of Chandra Ranganathan & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, dated 21.10.2009, in Civil Appeal Nos.6997 - 7002 of 2009, the Hon'ble Supreme Court declared that the retiring employees of the RBI would be eligible for exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Act and set aside the order passed by the Madras High Court, based on the circular issued by the Income Tax Department. 8. It is pertinent to note that pursuant to the judgment of the Bombay High Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Koodathil Kallyatan Ambujakshan (2008) 219 CTR (Bom) 80, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... om) 80 and the same stands confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chandra Ranganathan & Ors. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai, dated 21.10.2009, in Civil Appeal Nos.6997 - 7002 of 2009. Thereafter, the Special Leave Petitions filed in respect of orders of the Division Bench of this Court in S.L.P.Nos.5281 - 5339/2014, etc., batch were dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court leaving the question of law kept open, by an order dated 08.10.2014 and again, in Civil Appeal Nos.8908 of 2013, etc., batch, except Civil Appeal Nos.51 of 2010 and 4411 of 2010, all other appeals were dismissed by a common order dated 28.01.2015. This Court respectfully follow the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble Division Be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates