9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (6) TMI 1689X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts imported by the applicant (M/s. Aman Exports) as per terms and conditions contained in the aforesaid order. In spite of order of this Tribunal of 15-5-2018, it appears that the till date the imported goods have not been released provisionally. Therefore, the matter came up before us on 14-6-2018 by MA-76079/18 for the non-compliance of order of this Tribunal by the respondent. 2. The Ld. Advocate submitted on 14-6-2018 that the respondent is not releasing the goods in spite of Order from this Hon'ble Tribunal. Therefore vide the Order dated 14-6-2018, this Bench has asked for the personal presence of respondent Commissioner or the Adjudicating Officer. 3. Ld. DR and Shri A.K. Sukhla, Assistant Commissioner appeared today befo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds is such that with passage of time they are deteriorating its market value. 5. Ld. Advocate further submits that the respondent Commissioner should be ordered to allow the deposit of imported consignment under Section 49 of Customs Act immediately so that appellant is saved from incurring heavy container detention charge. He also states that the consignment is not being released even after the Order of this Hon'ble Tribunal on the pretext of filing appeal before Hon'ble Kolkata, High Court, which is causing irreparable demurrage to the appellant and the respondent should be personally made liable for injury caused to the appellant for his obstinate approach in holding up the consignments contrary to the provisions of Customs Law. 6 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on against the Order passed by it is to be laid before the Bench by filing Affidavit/Miscellaneous Application through Registry for its consideration. It is absolutely not permitted by any parties to appeal to directly address any letter to the Member of the Bench. Perhaps, the respondent is not aware of these rules and provisions and hence he entered into a direct communication with the Member which is impermissible. However, we do not take a serious view of it, this time, and advise the respondent Commissioner to refrain from addressing any communication to the Member of this Tribunal in future directly in response to any Order passed by it. 10. The copy of this order is being marked to Chief Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata for his ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
