9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (8) TMI 1514X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Respondent ORDER P.K.CHOUDHARY : The matter is listed for non-compliance of pre-deposit. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that against the confirmed demand of Rs. 73,899/-, they have already deposited an amount of Rs. 95,674/- along with interest of Rs. 27,303/- as under:- Sl. No. Financial Year Paid towards CENVAT (Rs.) Challan No. & date/Debit Entry ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 74/- which is in excess and is refundable amount, it would take care of the requirement of mandatory pre-deposit before the Tribunal in respect of penalty amount. Hence the requirement of pre-deposit stands duly complied with. With the consent of both the sides, the appeal itself is taken up for disposal. 3. The learned Advocate submits that they paid differential amount of Central Excise duty wi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the accounts of the appellant assessee including the balance sheets and there was no deliberate suppression of facts. Further the goods were cleared to related persons to consume the goods for goods for further manufacture of dutiable goods. 5. Learned Authorized Representative, appearing on behalf of the Revenue justifies the impugned order. 6. Heard both sides and perused the appeal records. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
