TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 75X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... p; Shri S. Gautam, DR for the respondent. [Order per P.K. Das, Member (Judicial) - The Appellant filed this appeal against imposition of penalty of Rs.1,35,100/- imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1944 by the revised order of the Commissioner of Central Excise. 2. Ld. Advocate submits that the Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of variou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n of the Tribunal as under:- (a) 2006 (4) STR 567 (T-D) (b) 2007 (8) STR 191 (T-D) 3. Ld. DR reiterates the findings of the Commissioner. He submits that the Appellant had not disputed the payment of tax at any point of time and the submission of the ld. Advocate, at this stage, has no effect. He further submits that he Appellant delayed the payment of tax and the Commissioner rightly imposed t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|