9911796707
TMI Blog1923 (1) TMI 6X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (I of 1913) in holding that the sheds, etc., existing on the site pre-empted, which had been erected by the defendant-vendee before the sale when he held the land on a lease, were structures within the purview of the said clause secondly. 2. The site in question is situated on the margin of a public road in Delhi and is about 210 square yards in area. The defendant originally obtained from th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ondly, Preemption Act. The structures, although not of a very massive nature are by no means of a temporary kind. The place is being used as a karkhana and the wooden pillars are well driven into the earth, and the roofing is sufficient to protect workers from the inclemencies of the weather. These structures were valued by an Overseer at Rs. 594-10-0. 3. It was argued on behalf of the plaint ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uilding or other structures on a site is like a co-owner in the property sold, and, therefore his right of pre-emption is inferior only to a co-sharer therein. The word building or structure is not defined in the Act but it may be stated that every building is a structure though every structure is not a building and the word structure can be applied to a wall or shed or any other unsubstant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
