TMI Blog2023 (4) TMI 170X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing and other financial services or not - HELD THAT:- This was a case where the assessee had not received any consideration while providing corporate guarantee to its group companies. No effort was made on behalf of the Revenue to assail the above finding or to demonstrate that issuance of corporate guarantee to group companies without consideration would be a taxable service. In these circumsta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . 2. Heard Mr. Tathagat Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. The challenge here is to the concurrent finding in favour of the assessee recorded by the Principal Commissioner GST which was upheld by the CEST Tribunal, through the impugned order on 16.02.2022. The learned counsel would submit that this case is similar to Civil Appeal No. 428/2020 @ Diary No.42703/2019 ( Commissioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s recorded:- further, the consideration can be of two types viz., monetary consideration and non monetary consideration. In the present case, the Assessee has argued that they have not received any consideration. In such case it s for the department to prove that the Assessee s claim is wrong. It is observed that nowhere in the Show Cause Notice, attempt has been made to prove that the Assess ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the purpose of taxability under Finance Act, 1994, not only, in relation to another, reveal a provider , but also the flow of consideration for rendering of the service. In the absence of any of these two elements, taxability under Section 66B of Finance Act, 1994 will not arise. It is clear that there is no consideration insofar as corporate guarantee issued by respondent on behalf of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... demonstrate that issuance of corporate guarantee to group companies without consideration would be a taxable service. In these circumstances, in view of such conclusive finding of both forums, we see no reason to admit this case basing upon the pending Civil Appeal No. 428 @ Diary No.42703/2019, particularly when it has not been demonstrated that the factual matrix of the pending case is identica ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|