Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1977 (8) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d firm mostly carrying on business in supply of machineries to Government departments. The relevant years of assessment are 1968-69 and 1969-70. The short facts relevant to appreciate the point raised are these : The State Government of Orissa decided to give preferential treatment in the matter of placing of orders for supply of materials to parties holding State Government Loan Bonds. On September 14, 1966, the Chief Engineer of the Rural Engineering Organisation wrote a letter to the assessee that since it had agreed to subscribe Rs. 5,00,000 for investment in State Government Loan Bonds, 1978, orders for supply of 100 MECE brand Hand Road Rollers-3 tons of ballast weight made of steel casting were placed with it and an advance of rupees .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the purpose of purchasing Government Loan Bonds and the loan taken from the bank was more for the purposes of investment than for purposes of business. He further found that the assessee had not received any interest on the loan bonds and payment of interest to the bank was not admissible in view of s. 19 of the Act. The assessee carried further appeals to the Appellate Tribunal and maintained that the letter of the Chief Engineer clearly indicated about the preference and the investment in Government Loan Bonds had been made as a measure of commercial expediency and for boosting up business. The Tribunal found as a fact that the loan taken from the bank had been invested in the purchase of Government Loan Bonds and the purchase of loa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Government Loan Bonds was directly connected with and was an integral part of the business activity of the appellant in supplying its products to the Government..." Learned standing counsel contends relying on the condition mentioned in the letter of the Chief Engineer that the advance was to be fully utilised in the purchase of the State Loan Bonds ; that it was not open to the assessee to extend accommodation to its sister concern in breach of the condition and without charging interest in its turn take a loan from the bank and pay interest for it and yet claim payment of interest by it to the bank as a deduction. Reliance is placed in support of such submission on a Bench decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of CIT v. U .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and no interest having been earned thereon, the deduction claimed is not admissible. In support of such a proposition, reliance is placed on a Bench decision of the Kerala High Court in the case of Catholic Bank of India Ltd. v. CIT [1967] 64 ITR 514. In the Kerala case, loss incurred by the assessee-bank in obtaining repayment of amounts covered by Treasury Savings Certificates before the expiry of the period for which the certificates had been issued was under consideration and the court was of the view that such a loss was of capital nature and was not allowable. To the facts of this case, the ratio in the said decision has absolutely no application. Learned standing counsel thereafter relied upon a Bench decision of this court in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nting in the reported decision of this court appears to have been found by the Appellate Tribunal as a fact. In these circumstances, there is no warrant for the contention of the learned standing counsel that the purchase of the Government Loan Bonds was in the nature of investment and, therefore, resulted in capital assets, loss wherein could not be admitted as revenue expenditure." We are in respectful agreement with the view indicated by the Division Bench in this case and would reiterate that the ratio in Patnaik Co.'s case must be confined to its own facts. According to assessee's counsel on the findings recorded by the Tribunal which are based on evidence and which are all factual and, therefore, binding on this court, the only .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates