TMI Blog2024 (8) TMI 436X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Mr. Jitendra Singh & Ms. Shivali Mhatre. For the Respondents : Mr. Vikas Khanchandani,. P.C. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has filed praying for the only relief as set out in prayer clause (a) which reads thus: "a. That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, Order o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the assessment year 2017-18 it was filed on 7 September 2021. The CIT(A), however, is not passing final orders despite the petitioner being heard on the first proceeding, as also written submissions being filed. 3. Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed that in similar circumstances, as the petitioner's appeal for the AY 2016-17 was not being decided, the petitioner had ear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pose for the aforementioned Section, we feel that the period of one year has since elapsed and much beyond that. Be that as it may, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal preferable within a period of six months from today." 4. It is the petitioner's contention that in these circumstances, prejudice is caused to the petitioner and more p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onclusion by a decision being rendered on such appeals as expeditiously as possible, this, more particularly, as earlier substantive order passed has also remained to be complied, in the spirit in which the same was made by the Court. As similar issues arise for consideration in both such appeals, we direct the CIT(A) to decide both the appeals in accordance with law within a period of four months ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|