The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order, declaring that the appellant shall not be...

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order, declaring that the appellant shall not be seen as having availed excess credit for initiating proceedings u/s 73 of the GST Act. The case revealed no wrong availment of credit, and the appellant's mistake of omitting to mention IGST figures separately in Form GSTR 3A was inadvertent and technical, insignificant as there was no outward supply attracting IGST. Proceedings u/s 73 are attracted only when tax has not been paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax wrongly availed or utilised, which did not occur in this case. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X