The ITAT held that the order passed by the Principal ...

Tribunal overturns tax disallowances, unexplained cash credits; jurisdictional issues unaddressed.

December 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act for disallowance u/s 40A(3) and addition on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 was not sustainable. The Tribunal observed that merely not mentioning the annexures or not asking for details does not render the order prejudicial or erroneous. The assessee's submissions regarding jurisdiction were not dealt with by the revenue. The Principal Commissioner did not invoke Explanation 2 to Section 263 to substantiate her view that the order was erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal disagreed with the Principal Commissioner's view without establishing how the order was erroneous or prejudicial.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the order passed by the Principal ...

Tribunal overturns tax disallowances, unexplained cash credits; jurisdictional issues unaddressed.

December 12, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for share application money received from various individuals. The company failed to prove the...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - When the cash did not pass at any stage and since the respective parties did not receive cash nor did pay any cash, there was no real...

Addition unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - shares were issued at premium to certain companies in lieu of the shares held by the said companies and there was thus no...

Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68. Interest paid on such unexplained loans also added to income. Assessee's contention of repayment of loans...

The Appellate Tribunal considered various issues. Firstly, on disallowance u/s. 14A r.w. Rule 8D(ii), it was held that no disallowance of interest expenditure was...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Rectification u/s 154 - The Assessee filed a rectification application, which was dismissed by the CIT(A) based on the assumption of Tribunal's adjudication on the issue....

Rejection of the books of accounts - best judgment assessment u/s 144 - addition of the sales made in cash on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - While the...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

Unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Co-ordinate Benches of the Tribunal have held that any sum found credited in bank passbook could not be treated as an...

Unsecured loan u/s 68 - Bogus cash credits - where there is a statutory rebuttable presumption against the assessee, as in case of cash credits etc., u/s 68 or...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - bogus unsecured loan - unexplained cash credit received from shell/paper companies under the garb of unsecured loan - The revenue...

The ITAT Raipur, an Appellate Tribunal, considered an appeal regarding unexplained cash credit u/s. 68. The assessee failed to explain the nature and source of cash...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Quick Updates: