The man has retired in the year 2000 as a labourer. He is ...

Retired Laborer Seeks Refund of Rs. 33,949; Tribunal Error Acknowledged, No High Court Escalation Due to Financial Impact.

May 15, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The man has retired in the year 2000 as a labourer. He is seeking refund of small sum of Rs.33,949/- which for him is very substantial. Only to correct an apparent error committed by the Tribunal, we would not drag him before High Court. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The man has retired in the year 2000 as a labourer. He is ...

Retired Laborer Seeks Refund of Rs. 33,949; Tribunal Error Acknowledged, No High Court Escalation Due to Financial Impact.

May 15, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

HC determined petitioner entitled to refund of Rs.33,69,271 paid under CGST Act following Section 128A implementation. Department confirmed adjustment of amount through...

The assessee, a sole proprietor running a petrol pump allotted by BPCL, deposited unexplained cash in the current bank account. The AO invoked Section 69A and made an...

SC ruled on a contract dispute involving a bidding error where appellant mistakenly bid Rs.1,569 instead of Rs.15,04,64,000. While acknowledging appellant's error in...

Transitional credit of input tax available under VAT Act sought. State contended refund application pursuant to Annexure-P/15 required. Court held refund of Rs....

Withholding of refund of GST - Sec.33-E and 33-F of the APGST Act give 6 months time to the respondents to complete the verification and the authorities cannot with hold...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the appellant is entitled to a refund of excess additional customs duty. The Tribunal accepted...

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

The public notice issued by the Office of the Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, provides special measures to facilitate the liquidation and rectification of errors...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Transitioning unutilized input tax credit under the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - error in claiming input tax credit of unadjusted TDS. The High Court held...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Seeking refunds of amount to the liquidation account of the Corporate Debtor - Present is a case where for refund, to which the Corporate Debtor is entitled, whether the...

The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) for disallowing the entire...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Refund claim u/s 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1994 was partially allowed. Refund of Rs. 20,52,143/- and Rs. 2,19,004/- granted,...

Quick Updates: