Home Highlights June 2013 Year 2013 This

You may also like:

1. Tribunal had passed the exparte order directing pre-deposit - repeated adjournment sought by the counsel - matter restored before tribunal for reconsideration - HC

2. Adjournment request - tribunal refused to adjourn the hearing and dismissed the appeal - when such requests were received by the Tribunal, seeking an adjournment of the...

3. Powers of the DRP u/s 144C(8) - Tribunal was not right in holding that the DRP exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order. In any event, the order passed by the DRP...

4. Contrary decision passed by A.O. against remand back order of Tribunal - Decision of the tribunal is binding on the Assessing Officer and he cannot pick up a word or...

5. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

6. Execution of the award passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal/Court - If the High Courts convert itself to the Executing Court and entertain the writ petitions under...

7. Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal while testing the correctness of the order passed by the PCIT has also not dealt with the issues, which were specifically pleaded by the...

8. Ex-parte order rejecting the repetitive adjournments - The petitioners had no right to seek unlimited adjournments nor seek adjournment without any basis. - HC

9. Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for...

10. Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction - funds infused into the shell companies by multiple layering in the guise of share capital or loan - as contended on the side...

11. Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

12. Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that...

13. The CESTAT New Delhi, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a request for restoration of an appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. The appellant had submitted an...

14. Power of adjournment - giving a choice of three dates for personal hearing in one letter and seeking of adjournment by the appellant by one month, would not amount to...

15. The Appellate Tribunal reviewed an ex parte order by the CIT(A) concerning the addition of unexplained income under sections 69 and 69A, with tax levied under section...