Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2013 Year 2013 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mere admission of an appeal by the High ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 29, 2013

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mere admission of an appeal by the High Court cannot without there being anything further, be an indication that the issue is debatable one so as to delete the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - the entire addition itself becomes debatable one. It is well settled proposition of law that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c)...

  2. Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Issues on basis of which ALP shown by the assessee has been rejected are debatable - No penalty - AT

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  4. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

  6. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to payment of commission - it is evident that these are debatable issues - In any...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor...

  9. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

  10. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  11. Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

  12. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

  13. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  14. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates