Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2013 Year 2013 This

Rectification/ Recall of order u/s 254(2) - the assessee is ...


Tribunal's Order u/s 254(2) Can't Be Reviewed, Only Rectified for Apparent Mistakes.

July 29, 2013

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Rectification/ Recall of order u/s 254(2) - the assessee is merely seeking a review of the order of the Tribunal, which is not possible in these proceedings under S.254(2) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

  2. Rectification u/s 254 - No mistake, much less, a mistake apparent on the face of record as envisaged under section 254(2) of the Act. What the assessee wants by filing...

  3. Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - Without prejudice to the above, assuming the findings of the ITAT is not correct than it would not amount to...

  4. Tribunal apparently fell into an error in not rectifying the said mistake apparent on the face of record, which is nothing more than a mistake of fact and even if it is...

  5. Rectification of mistake u/s 254 - If such prayer is allowed then in every case, where the assessee is not satisfied with the finding of the Tribunal, the MA will be...

  6. Rectification of mistake - The scope and ambit of the power which could be exercised u/s 254(2) is circumscribed and restricted within the ambit of the power vested by...

  7. Rectification u/s 254 - mistake apparent from record - non adjudication of specific ground taken by the assessee in its memorandum of appeal constitutes a mistake...

  8. ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

  9. Rectification of mistake - Refusal to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008 - Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008, does not impose...

  10. Rectification u/s 154 - The ld. AR invited our attention in ITR 7 where it is mentioned that the correct figures in claim of section 11(1)(2) of the Act. The assessee...

  11. A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

  12. Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

  13. Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D in rectification proceedings u/s 154 - Mandation of recording satisfaction - Recording of satisfaction by the Assessing Officer under Rule...

  14. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - the power u/s 154 is not a power to review an order and the power can be invoked to rectify a mistake, which is apparent from the...

  15. Rectification of mistakes -The power to rectify a mistake u/s 254(2) cannot be used for recalling the entire order. No power of review has been given to the Tribunal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates