Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier ...

Court Agrees to Review Judgment After Finding Error; Aims to Correct Mistake to Serve Justice.

August 27, 2013

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier judgment suffers from error apparent on the face of record and is liable to be recalled/reviewed. The purpose of justice will not be served by rejecting the Review Application and perpetuating the error again - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier ...

Court Agrees to Review Judgment After Finding Error; Aims to Correct Mistake to Serve Justice.

August 27, 2013

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

The case involves a review petition filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking to recall an order that dismissed an appeal due to the absence of substantial...

The High Court considered the scope of review jurisdiction regarding the inclusion of purchase price of plant and machinery in 'Fixed Capital Investment'. Review power...

Rectification of mistake - Calculation of correct Fe content - Iron Ore Fines - The correct Fe content was required to be determined on the basis of the guidelines...

The HC held that the review application was partly allowed. There was no mistake apparent on record regarding the application of the Supreme Court decision and the...

Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

Admission of additional evidence - The legislative intent in enacting Section 391 is to empower the appellate court to see that justice is done and if the appellate...

Petition challenging validity of reopening assessment u/s 148 dismissed. No final order passed, jurisdictional issue raised for first time in review petition. Statutory...

Review petition before High Court - reliance on a decision from which High court was in disagreement in other decision and overlooked the judgment in the assessee’s case...

The High Court allowed the petitioner to rectify GSTR-1 for the months of October and November 2022 regarding five export invoices, despite the statutory time limit...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Availment of wrongful credit - bonafide mistake - The High Court observed that the mistake made by the appellants was inadvertent, and despite the acknowledgment of the...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

Quick Updates: