Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2013 Year 2013 This

Nature of assessment – penalty - confiscation – When there was ...


Section 114A Penalty: No Imposition Without Demand; Confiscation Stands Despite Provisional Assessment Argument.

September 16, 2013

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Nature of assessment – penalty - confiscation – When there was no such demand no penalty can be imposed u/s 114A – assesses contended that the goods could not have been confiscated because the assessment was provisional - This argument was legally not tenable - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Jurisdiction - power of Additional Director General of DRI to issue SCN - Penalties were imposed under section 114, 114A and 114 AA of Customs Act - The SCN under...

  2. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  3. Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

  4. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  5. The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

  6. Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There...

  7. Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There...

  8. The case pertains to confiscation and redemption of goods, levy of penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, and determination of capacity of suction pumps and excess...

  9. The case involved confiscation of imported goods, imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods in question were men's...

  10. Penalty u/s 114A and 114AA of Customs Act - providing wrong information in the course of business - The penalty imposed under Section 114AA and the penalty imposed under...

  11. CESTAT upheld confiscation of undeclared and excess imported goods while setting aside confiscation of properly declared items. The tribunal rejected Revenue's...

  12. Imposition of penalty - If the proceedings of demand of duty and confiscation were made against main party and the same being dropped, subsequent parties are also not...

  13. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  14. 100% EOU - served from India scheme (SFIS) - Recovery of duties of customs foregone - There is no finding in the order of the original authority holding the goods liable...

  15. CESTAT set aside the confiscation of foreign liquors and various foreign goods as well as penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates