Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2017 Year 2017 This

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to ...


Penalty Valid u/s 114A of Customs Act Without Naming Importer, Court Clarifies Requirement Details.

February 8, 2017

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There is no requirement for a specific mention of the importer to validate the penalty under section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act, 1962 - failure to specify the name of the firm or individual on whom the penalty u/s 114A of CA, 1962 was fastened - There...

  2. Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

  3. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

  5. Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

  6. Penalty u/s 114A and 114AA of Customs Act - providing wrong information in the course of business - The penalty imposed under Section 114AA and the penalty imposed under...

  7. Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate...

  8. AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

  9. Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

  10. The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

  11. The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

  12. Appellant produced wrong 'Country-of-Origin' certificate to claim notification benefit, amounting to mis-declaration and suppression of facts. Duty along with interest...

  13. Penalty - under Section 114A of the Customs Act - to impose penalty u/s 114A act of collusion, willful mis-statement or mis-representation needs to be proved - as not...

  14. Rectification in the register of members - transfer of shares - execution of valid transfer deeds within the meaning of Section 108 is a mandatory requirement of a valid...

  15. The CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the penalties imposed u/s 114A of the Customs Act. The Tribunal held that penalty u/s 114A can only be imposed when duty is...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates