Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any ...

Case Laws Customs

March 1, 2014

Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any satisfactory explanation for use of the sister’s address except disowning the goods and denial the contents of statement of co-noticees - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any ...

Case Laws Customs

March 1, 2014

You may also like:

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Exporter's explanation accepted regarding mismatch between goods and invoice. No deliberate mis-declaration...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has...

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Mis-declaration of the goods - Levy of penalty on customs broker - Can the importer’s argument that they had placed an order for some other goods and the overseas...

When there is mis-declaration of goods, show cause notice can be issued within a period of five years from the date of findng mis-declaration by the investigating authority - AT

The case involved verification of Certificate of Origin and non-compliance of FSSAI Regulations u/s 111(m) and 112(a) of the Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the goods...

Goods were mis-declared in baggage declaration for export, rendering them liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed under Customs Act: Section 114 on individuals...

Mis-declaration of quantity and value of goods in SEZ unit - penalty u/ss 112(a) and 114A of Customs Act 1962. Option for reduced 25% penalty u/s 114A to be extended if...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Classification of imported goods - the appellant accepted the mis-declaration in writing. If the pipes and profiles were indeed old, the appellant could have, instead of...

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

Levy of penalty - Mis-declaration of goods - Self assessment of Bill of entry - While the importer is required to subscribe to the truth of the contents of the Bill of...

Quick Updates: