Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any ...

Appellant Penalized for Misdeclaration of Goods; Failed to Explain Use of Sister's Address and Denied Co-Noticees' Statements.

March 1, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any satisfactory explanation for use of the sister’s address except disowning the goods and denial the contents of statement of co-noticees - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - Mis declaration of goods - ppellant failed to give any ...

Appellant Penalized for Misdeclaration of Goods; Failed to Explain Use of Sister's Address and Denied Co-Noticees' Statements.

March 1, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods, specifically modems and automated teller machine processors. The...

Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

Appellate Tribunal set aside orders denying remission of excise duty on indigenous goods and customs duty on imported goods destroyed in factory fire. Tribunal found no...

The case involves misdeclaration of imported goods as display cabinets instead of freezers. The appellant paid differential duty but later claimed it was under pressure...

Confiscation of goods u/s 111 - Freezing of bank account - Smuggling of goods - appellant has failed to explain the source of the imported goods sale proceeds whereof...

HC dismissed the appeal concerning condonation of delay in filing second appeal regarding misdeclaration of imported Brass Ceramic Cartridges. The appellant failed to...

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

The CESTAT held that the expression 'liable to penalty' u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 means that a person who knowingly makes a false declaration may be penalised,...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Classification of imported goods - Navigation System - Multifunctional Devices or not -The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal No.84/2018, confirming the classification...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

A recent Circular provides clarification on the provisions of clause (ca) of Section 10(1) of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 regarding the place of...

Smuggling - Norephedrine - misdeclaration of goods exported - prohibited goods or not - Needless to say that the test report is the basis for holding that the goods...

Misdeclaration in the quantity of goods imported - enhancement of the value - Transaction value - demand of duty - The tribunal noted the discrepancy in quantity but...

Quick Updates: