Complain under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Mere existence of ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

March 11, 2014

Complain under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Mere existence of an arbitration agreement, assuming there is one between the petitioner and respondent No. 2, would not bar the maintainability of a consumer claim - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Complain under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Mere existence of ...

Case Laws Indian Laws

March 11, 2014

You may also like:

Existence of arbitration agreement between the parties - This Court is of the opinion that merely because the proposal forwarded on behalf of the respondents, by letter...

Arbitration application allowed u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court's role limited to determining existence of arbitration agreement and not...

Non-Stamping of arbitration agreements - Agreements which are not stamped or are inadequately stamped are inadmissible in evidence under Section 35 of the Stamp Act....

Jurisdiction of the referral court at pre-referral stage - arbitration agreement - If the dispute/issue with respect to the existence and validity of an arbitration...

Rejection of applications under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - There being no doubt about non-existence of arbitration agreement in relation...

The doctrine of forum non conveniens was applied to determine the maintainability of a petition u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that...

Contempt of Court - willful disobedience - The breach of undertaking amounts to contempt as defined under Section 2 (b) of Contempt of Court Act but a remedy is provided...

Arbitration agreement - Applicability on the party who is not the signatory of the agreement - Scope of Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The...

Arbitration - Section 16(1)(a) provides that an arbitration clause which forms part of the contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of...

Arbitration - The jurisdiction clause of an agreement, the absence of words like “alone”, “only”, “exclusive” or “exclusive jurisdiction” is neither decisive nor does it...

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of Section 11 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the referral courts need only examine whether the...

The Court addressed whether a non-signatory party should be referred to arbitration along with the signatory parties. It held that the referral court must prima facie...

The High Court exceeded its limited jurisdiction u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by undertaking a detailed examination of the factual matrix and...

Rightful owners of 4000 shares or not - Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - The Appellate Tribunal emphasizes that the NCLT's...

The High Court addressed the restriction on the petitioner's claim for GST amounts due to the end of the agreement between the respondent and the renter. The court held...

Quick Updates: