Although the appellant has financed for the importation of the ...

Case Laws Customs

May 22, 2014

Although the appellant has financed for the importation of the consignments but there is no whisper about the ownership and the financer having handled or have made any declaration on the Bill of Entry filed, penalty under Section 112(a) cannot be imposed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Although the appellant has financed for the importation of the ...

Case Laws Customs

May 22, 2014

You may also like:

Seizure of imported consignment - mis-declaration of goods - Ownership of goods - BOE is in different name - In the facts of this case, it is not possible for us to...

Extension of time for re-import of goods - In this case, export consignment could not pass the test of FDA, and accordingly, the appellant has no option for...

Resolution Professional us/s 60(5) r/w 14 seeking release of goods - CIRP already initiated - the Corporate Debtor not being the consignee nor the importer of the goods...

GTA service or not - The adjudicating authority while declining the transportation activity as a GTA service has held that since there is no consignment note, the same...

Leviability of service tax - clearing and forwarding agent service - although the appellant had entered into the consignment agency agreement with TSL this agreement was...

Import of Toys - Import policy - Wither the goods are excluded under the scope of BIS, the testing of the same could be made mandatory - the testing procedures have to...

Classification of services - GTA services - person unregistered with GST, providing road transport services by his own truck - issuance of E-way bill - consignment note'...

Claim of rebate/ refund - export consignment was not sealed - ARE-Is, did not have a certification of the Central Excise Officer that the export goods were sealed with...

Penalty u/s 112(a) - frozen peas, the goods under importation, has not been found fit for importation - penalty confirmed - AT

LTCG - exemption claimed u/s 54F - fractional ownership - Whether joint ownership of 16.67% in six flats constituted owning more than one residential house. - The ITAT...

The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

Classification of services - GTA services or not - cartage Challan - Such carting Challan is not equivalent to a consignment note which is issued by the transporter. The...

Classification of supply - GTA Service - Sub-contracting activity - one consignment note issued by the contractor and second consignment note issued by the...

The Appellate Tribunal adjudicated on the issue of addition of interest income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the interest income from a Fixed...

Recovery of Rebate claim after two years from sanction of refund - There is no iota of even whisper that the assessee had any intention to evade the duty. The admitted...

Quick Updates: