Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 30, 2014

Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to typographical mistake. A procedural mistake cannot be made the basis for denying substantive right when such a manufacturing facility is not available at their Makarpura unit of the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Wrong mentioning of address in the PAC was only due to ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 30, 2014

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non appearance before the Assessing Officer - AO kept an issuing notices on the wrong address even when the first notice was not served...

Cancellation of private bonded warehouse license u/s 58B of Customs Act, 1962 due to non-compliance with CBIC Circular No. 34/2019 regarding mentioning licensed premises...

Failure to service notice due to wrong email address - The assessee was not served notice due to wrong reference of email address, therefore, in our view the assessee...

Exemption u/s 11 denied - certain mistakes were made in ticking of certain circle - i A typographical mistake or minor procedural lapse cannot act as an estoppel to deny...

Levy of penalty - Detention of goods alongwith vehicle - wrong E-way bill - in penal provision such as Section 129 of the GST Act, the element of intention to evade tax...

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Wrong mention of unit name in invoices - Assessee's address was correctly mentioned - just for this mistake the denial of Cenvat credit is...

Non-payment of Service Tax - Mentioning of wrong service tax registration in the payment challan for two months - Mentioning of wrong location code - in view of the...

CENVAT credit - procedural lapses - whether credit of Cenvat taken on the basis of ISD Invoices issued by the Head Office of the appellant units is deniable for curable...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - invoices do not contain PAN based registration number - invoices having wrong address - the mistakes committed on the said invoices...

This case pertains to the validity of an order passed u/s 250 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of expenditure due to a...

Rejection of benefit of SVLDRS - mistake of not mentioning the penalty - filing of details in the wrong column i.e. filing details in the column 9.1 instead of column...

Taxable services or not - mining services - Appellant had been providing taxable services in the state of Jharkhand prior to obtaining registration in the state of...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

The High Court considered a case regarding refund of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner's refund application was rejected due to lack of supporting documents. The...

Refund - amount which was credited in the wrong account due to inadvertent mistake - Undoubtedly, it was a mistake which was committed by the consultant of the...

Quick Updates: