Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim ...

Taxpayer's Bona Fide Belief Validates 100% Deduction Claim u/s 80IC; No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

March 15, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders passed by the revenue authorities, appellate authorities, the High Court and Supreme Court on this issue lend credence to the fact that the belief of the assessee was a bonafide belief to claim the deduction - No penalty leviable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim ...

Taxpayer's Bona Fide Belief Validates 100% Deduction Claim u/s 80IC; No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c.

March 15, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) – assessee in bona fide belief that Dharmada collections were not part of its income but were diverted by an overriding title towards...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The Revenue argued that the assessee's actions constituted furnishing inaccurate particulars of income or concealing income. However, the High...

Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - The assessee has immediately on receipt of the notice u/s 142(1) has revised the computation of income restricting the deduction claimed u/s 54F...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - claimed higher deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) based on opinion of the Central Statutory Auditors - latter on based on different view canvassed against...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Quick Updates: