Demand of service tax - Jurisdiction error - No service provided ...

Court Rules Financial Burden Over 7.5 Lakhs Insufficient for Article 226 Intervention in Service Tax Jurisdiction Case.

April 29, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Demand of service tax - Jurisdiction error - No service provided - Merely because the petitioner will have to shell out more than 7.5 lakhs, it cannot be a ground to exercise to interfere with under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of service tax - Jurisdiction error - No service provided ...

Court Rules Financial Burden Over 7.5 Lakhs Insufficient for Article 226 Intervention in Service Tax Jurisdiction Case.

April 29, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

This legal summary concerns the maintainability of a Section 7 application for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor....

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

The Corporate Debtor denied the existence of a loan agreement with 12% interest, as claimed by the Financial Creditor in the Section 7 application. To qualify as a...

AO's addition of "washout charges" as income was rejected. ITAT held that washout charges are business income, not speculative income. Even if speculative, it would be...

CIRP process - security deposit and/or intercorporate deposit - Whether this ‘Security Deposit’ and the interest thereon would fall within the ambit of the definition of...

Seizure of goods alongwith vehicle - concluded proceedings in terms of Section 129(5) on payment of amount as per section 129(3) - The contention of the petitioner that...

Petitioner challenged SCN alleging conspiracy to issue fake invoices without actual supply using another entity's GST registration for tax evasion. HC held petitioner...

Initiation of CIRP - Financial creditor within the meaning of sub-section (7) of Section 5 of the IBC - The Supreme Court affirmed the NCLAT’s judgment, holding that the...

The High Court interpreted the phrase "where it is possible to do so" u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ruling that it allows flexibility only in exceptional...

Power of the High Court in exercising extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 - assessment of conflicting technical reports - It is well settled that the High...

National Financial Reporting Authority (Amendment) Rules, 2019 - Rule 2, Rule 3, Rule 5 and Rule 11 amended.

The petitioner filed appeals against orders under CGST/SGST Acts after a delay of four years. The court held that it cannot normally exercise jurisdiction under Article...

The NCLAT upheld the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor (Respondent No.1) for initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It held...

Financial Creditors or not - a person having only security interest over the assets of corporate debtor, even if falling within the description of 'secured creditor' by...

Quick Updates: