Powers of the Commissioner while dealing with penalty appeal are ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 1, 2015

Powers of the Commissioner while dealing with penalty appeal are restricted to the penalty proceedings only. He may confirm or cancel the imposition of penalty. He may enhance or reduce the penalty. He cannot give direction to the AO for exploring the additions in an assessment - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Powers of the Commissioner while dealing with penalty appeal are ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 1, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Penalty U/s 271B - Failure to get accounts audited - Penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271AAA of the Act – Penalty proceedings and quantum proceedings are separate and distinct and the parameters which are applicable to the assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – penalty proceedings are separate from those of the assessment proceedings and confirmation of additions may not be the sole ground...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions u/ss 54EC and 54F. Assessee admitted and withdrew incorrect claim u/s 54EC, constituting furnishing of...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - penalty proceedings are distinguished and separate and assessee can raise fresh plea in the penalty proceedings, which has been done in this case - AT

Quick Updates: