Assessment by Mumbai AO - The jurisdiction would lie with the ...

Mumbai Tax Assessment Invalid Due to Jurisdiction; New Delhi Authorities Hold Correct Authority to Proceed Before Deadline.

December 17, 2011

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Assessment by Mumbai AO - The jurisdiction would lie with the Income Tax Authorities at New Delhi. - This was brushed aside only on the ground that the assessment was getting time barred on 31 March 2011 and it was now not possible to transfer the case papers to the Authorities at New Delhi - Assessment is invalid.... - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment by Mumbai AO - The jurisdiction would lie with the ...

Mumbai Tax Assessment Invalid Due to Jurisdiction; New Delhi Authorities Hold Correct Authority to Proceed Before Deadline.

December 17, 2011

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Territorial Jurisdiction of Delhi High Court - LLP is registered in Hyderabad - It is evident from the facts of the present case that there is no principal or...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

Short/non-payment of service tax - Jurisdiction to raise the Demand - The Tribunal notes that during the period in question, the Appellant was registered in Mumbai and...

HC ruled on territorial jurisdiction in a tax appeal case. Original assessment order was passed by AO in Amritsar, while appeal was filed in Delhi. Following precedents...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

For payment of tax, no assessment order is required and only in case of short payment of tax assessment is required after due notice - but for the deferral in payment of...

ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell...

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Revision u/s 263 - Assessment u/s 153C - revision of invalid assessment - the present proceedings being collateral proceedings and if the assessment order is inherently...

Jurisdiction powers to issue Reopening notice in metro city - It was established that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued by an Income Tax Officer (ITO),...

Quick Updates: