Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2025 Year 2025 This

ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings ...


Tax Notice Under Section 148 Invalidated Due To Wrong Jurisdiction As Assessee Falls Under Delhi Instead Of Jaipur

February 24, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell under ITO Ward 70(3), Delhi's jurisdiction per section 124 of IT Act. The department had not exercised transfer powers under sections 120 or 127. The tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence establishing Delhi jurisdiction, making the Jaipur ACIT's notice legally invalid. The improper jurisdictional notice rendered all consequential assessment proceedings void. The assessee's appeal was allowed, invalidating both the reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Seeking grant of pre-arrest bail - Territorial jurisdiction of court - supply of material/ goods without invoices to evade the tax - the corporate office of MEPL is at...

  2. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  3. Non-payment of GST - recovery of tax alongwith interest and penalty - Jurisdiction - Even if we accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that...

  4. Territorial Jurisdiction of Delhi High Court - LLP is registered in Hyderabad - It is evident from the facts of the present case that there is no principal or...

  5. HC determined that petitioners improperly engaged in forum shopping by filing a second petition challenging ICICI Bank's fraud classification of their accounts. Since...

  6. Demand of service tax on the basis of income-tax return filed by respondents at Jaipur - Departmental authority at Jaipur have no jurisdiction to proceed against the...

  7. The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

  8. The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

  9. Jurisdiction of High Court - The doctrine of precedents - Rule of binding efficacy of law - Revenue file appeal with P&H High court instead of Delhi High court - No...

  10. Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material,...

  11. Income accrued/taxable in India - Tax Resident - The assessee before us is certainly an Indian national, but he is admittedly resident in the UAE so far as his...

  12. Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

  13. Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

  14. Withdrawing the excess tax credit for advance tax and self-assessment tax - Rectification u/s 154 - The assessee has to furnish details of different payments of tax by...

  15. Territorial Jurisdiction - demand of service tax - Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore has no jurisdiction to make any demand of service tax in respect of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates