Depreciation on energy saving devices - as depreciation claimed ...

Taxpayer's Depreciation on Energy-Saving Devices Valid; Assessing Officer's Objection Overruled by Statutory Provisions.

October 6, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Depreciation on energy saving devices - as depreciation claimed by assessee is in terms with the statutory provisions, AO was not justified in interfering with the same. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Depreciation on energy saving devices - as depreciation claimed ...

Taxpayer's Depreciation on Energy-Saving Devices Valid; Assessing Officer's Objection Overruled by Statutory Provisions.

October 6, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Depreciation on Set Top Boxes (STB) - @80% OR 15% - STB’s are energy saving devices OR electrical equipment - Set Top Box is a device connected to a TV and which allows...

Disallowance of depreciation on account of energy saving and pollution control devices - AO has not disputed the fact that the devices were installed. The level of...

The contention of the assessee that the UPS is an energy saving device, therefore, depreciation @ 80% should be granted cannot be accepted - AT

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Rejection of objections of the assessee - The stance of the Assessing Officer leads this Court to prima facie believe that the...

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer based on an audit objection were invalid. The Court observed that the Assessing...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Claim of assessee for depreciation @ 80% of energy saving devices denied - after the introduction of concept of “block of assets”, the assets loose identity the moment...

The ITAT held that: The department cannot challenge the validity of the sanctioned scheme at the implementation stage as the scheme attains statutory force binding on...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - objections regarding reason to believe raised first time at appellate stage - If reasons recorded upon being challenged at any stage of...

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - The assessing officer's reliance on CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2014 to make disallowance u/s 14A is legally untenable and liable to...

The High Court quashed the reassessment order due to procedural defects. The Assessing Officer failed to dispose of the assessee's objections through a speaking order...

Excess rate of depreciation - energy saving devices – scope the term 'before due date' - When the time of filing the return is available to the assessee till the last...

Determining the jurisdiction of appellate forum - jurisdiction of this Tribunal - The Tribunal refers to the legal precedent established in a Supreme Court case...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - while disposing of the objections against the reopening, Assessing Officer has observed that it has credible information as received by...

Quick Updates: