Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 – There was ...

Case Laws Service Tax

October 28, 2015

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 – There was suppression of material facts with intention to evade payment of service tax as it was already collected from service recipients but was not paid to department - waiver of penalty denied - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 – There was ...

Case Laws Service Tax

October 28, 2015

You may also like:

Imposition of penalties - Security Agency Service - Once the appellant has shown the duty liability in their Books of Accounts which clearly means that there was no...

Penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - Non-payment of Service Tax collected from clients due to the financial difficulties - The delay / non-payment of service tax cannot...

Imposition of penalties u/s 76, 77 and 78 - Service tax payment on reverse charge basis is available as Cenvat Credit - In a Revenue neutral situation no intention to...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - apart from a mere sentence that there is prima facie case of suppression of facts and intention to evade payment of service tax, there is no...

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - continuous default in paying service tax - statute has provided for cases/situations where there is a possibility of payment of Service Tax....

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Imposition of penalty - intention to evade service tax - it is found that the contention of the appellant that they bona fidely believed that they are not liable to pay...

Except mere allegation of suppression, the Department did not bring any material on record to prove that there was suppression and concealment of facts to evade payment...

Extended period of limitation - the reason of fraud or collusion or suppression of facts, etc., “with intent to evade payment of service tax” is a necessary ingredient....

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Restoration of penalty imposed u/s 76, 77 and 78 of FA - On being pointed out, the assessee has immediately paid the service tax along with interest. Given this factual...

Imposition of penalty - Advertisement Agency Service - non-payment of Service tax - Section 78 - when the first SCN was issued, the subsequent SCN cannot allege...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

Quick Updates: