Maintainability of petition under sections 397 & 398 of the ...

Case Laws Companies Law

November 6, 2015

Maintainability of petition under sections 397 & 398 of the Companies Act 1956 - oppression and mismanagement - withdrawal of suit without liberty will not make this CP non-maintainable. For having the respondents failed to establish that this petition is not maintainable, on the allegations referred above, hereby decide this issue against the respondents. - CLB

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of petition under sections 397 & 398 of the ...

Case Laws Companies Law

November 6, 2015

You may also like:

Oppression and mismanagement - issuance of 30,000 equity shares by private placements - From the facts of this case, it is clear that Respondent nos. 2 and 3 had...

Oppression and mismanagement - Transfer of shares - Once it is accepted that the Appellant can also challenge the transfer of shareholding as being oppressive and as...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Principles of quasi partnership - The private agreements can neither be sought to be enforced nor their breach give any cause of action to...

Oppression and mis-management - The discretionary power under Section 402 of the Companies Act are residuary in nature and in addition to the powers available to the CLB...

Oppression and mismanagement - allotment of shares - the High Court has opined that these acts in overall factual matrix of the case, were sufficient to conclude that...

Application u/s 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Whether the dispute raised in a properly filed petition under sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the...

Maintability of appeal - It would be unsafe to match the colour of one case with that of the other indiscriminately - CLB was right in its view that ITNL was a “member”...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Violation of the Status quo order - This Tribunal comes to a resultant conclusion that while passing of status quo order it should be...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Quick Updates: