The penalty imposed on the appellant is unwarranted as the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

March 30, 2016

The penalty imposed on the appellant is unwarranted as the Service Tax liability and interest thereof was paid by the appellant before the issuance of show-cause notice. Provisions of Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 would apply - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The penalty imposed on the appellant is unwarranted as the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

March 30, 2016

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

If the service providers has discharged Service tax liability and interest thereof, the penalty is not imposable under renting of immovable property as per provisions of...

The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

Self Adjustment of excess service tax paid with the service tax liabilities for subsequent period - Service tax amount paid at higher rate for the service tax...

Liability of Service Tax – direct service tax liability or not due to reverse charge on recipient of services – Appellant was not distributor of mutual fund or agent...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Validity of order of settlement commission whereas service tax liability has been settled at a certain sum with interest and penalty - petitioner discharged service tax...

Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

The appellant wrongly availed Cenvat credit on input services for unsold flats after issuance of completion certificate, contravening Rules 6(3) and 6(3A) of the Cenvat...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Adjustment of tax liability – Out of input tax credit available – dealer can adjust current year tax liability out of Input Tax Credit available in credit of dealer -...

Demand of Service Tax - Reverse charge mechanism - import of services - As such it is not the liability of service recipient but the liability of service provider which...

Quick Updates: