Refund - unjust enrichment - The bank guarantees were ...

Case Laws Customs

May 9, 2016

Refund - unjust enrichment - The bank guarantees were undoubtedly securities to safeguard the interest of the Revenue but, once the High Court dismissed the petitions and vacated the interim relief, the duty became payable as on that date - at that stage, it was in the nature of duty and not a security - Refund not allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - unjust enrichment - The bank guarantees were ...

Case Laws Customs

May 9, 2016

You may also like:

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - encashed amount of bank guarantee which is nothing else than the excise duty is clearly governed by the provisions of unjust...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Unjust enrichment - Section 27(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 - the question of providing unjust enrichment would not arise in the case of refund of cash securities - AT

Unjust enrichment - Consumer Welfare Fund - refund of cash security which was made in terms of the Board's circular does not attract the provisions unjust enrichment - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund - The solvent security is that of a person who is entitled to/recipient of the amount. Whereas, the ‘bank guarantee’ is a guarantee given by the bank on behalf of...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Quick Updates: