TPA - payment of royalty - Since the nature of payment was ...

DRP and Tribunal Confirm Payment as Revenue Expenditure, Aligning with Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision.

July 19, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TPA - payment of royalty - Since the nature of payment was examined by DRP and it was found as revenue expenditure and the direction of the DRP attained finality, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(Appeals) has rightly found that the payment was revenue in nature. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TPA - payment of royalty - Since the nature of payment was ...

DRP and Tribunal Confirm Payment as Revenue Expenditure, Aligning with Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision.

July 19, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision allowing deduction of Finance Lease Rental Payments under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure. Revenue's appeal challenging depreciation...

Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

Prior period expenditure - Whether Tribunal is right in holding that the expenditure was crystalized during the relevant previous year when the assessee hijmself has...

Appeal before CIT(A) - Non deposit of admitted tax/advance tax as provided u/s 249(4) - Payment of tax is mandatory but the requirement of paying such tax before filing...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under section 195, specifically disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for payments labeled as...

Revenue expenditure versus capital expenditure - expenditure incurred on ERP Software – allowed as revenue expenditure - AT

In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

Royalty payment - revenue expenditure or capital expenditure - payment is purely revenue in nature, as they provide for payment of license fee for manufacture and sale...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Quick Updates: