Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2016 Year 2016 This

Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - undisclosed cash deposits - assessee ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 26, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - undisclosed cash deposits - assessee argued that as sufficient surrender has been made by the assessee suo motu, the penalty proceedings initiated against him should be quashed - contention of the assessee rejected - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  2. This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

  3. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  4. Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

  5. The assessee made cash deposits during the demonetization period which were treated as unexplained u/s 69A. However, the Tribunal held that the cash deposits were within...

  6. Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

  7. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - unexplained cash deposit - the assessee has requested the Assessing Officer to treat the incurred cash deposit as his total sales receipts of...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that the assessee and his son have declared the undisclosed income in their individual return of income and have paid taxes but capital...

  10. The ITAT Delhi held that the CIT(A) erred in presuming all cash deposits as business receipts u/s 44AD. The CIT(A) treated deposits as business receipts and applied 8%...

  11. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

  12. Unexplained cash deposits in bank - receipt of rental deposits in cash - The fact remains that the cash rental deposits have been received by the assessee which is not...

  13. Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

  14. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  15. Addition u/s 69A being cash deposit in the Bank A/c during the demonetization period - cash deposit out of the sale proceeds effected prior to the ban of currency notes...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates