Refund - Principles of unjust enrichment - periodical revision ...

Appellant Granted Refund Due to Unjust Enrichment; No Excess Amount Received Beyond Agreed Settlement Under Excise Rules.

November 28, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund - Principles of unjust enrichment - periodical revision of the price depending on the price prevailing in the market - appellant is entitled to refund since not received a single rupee more than the settled amount - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Principles of unjust enrichment - periodical revision ...

Appellant Granted Refund Due to Unjust Enrichment; No Excess Amount Received Beyond Agreed Settlement Under Excise Rules.

November 28, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund of Excise Duty - unjust enrichment - As it is on record that excess duty and differential excess amount received by the appellant has been refunded to the dealers...

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund claim of excess duty denied due to unjust enrichment - goods sold based on LME price index. Revenue contended appellant booked excess duty as revenue expenditure...

Refund of service tax paid - unjust enrichment - Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld the order of original authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of unjust...

Refund - Unjust Enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - The Tribunal observed that the doctrine of unjust enrichment is not attracted in this case as the...

Refund - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is on record that the amounts were deducted from their bills and the client had forced the Appellant to make the remittance...

Quick Updates: