Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants ...

Case Laws Service Tax

December 15, 2016

Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately for transportation from Nepal border to factory premises alongwith other expenses, they do not become the agents of the appellants - appellants cannot be treated as recipients of GTA services - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants ...

Case Laws Service Tax

December 15, 2016

You may also like:

GTA Service – reverse charge mechanism - is appellant receiving GTA services from exporter? - Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately...

Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately for transportation from Nepal border to factory premises alongwith other expenses, they do not...

Reimbursement of expenses - Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately for transportation from Nepal border to factory premises alongwith...

If the bill amount indicates cargo handling service separately and transportation separately on actuals basis, then the Service Tax liability can be levied on cargo...

Advance Authorisation Scheme - Request of the appellant for endorsing advance authorisation numbers on the free shipping bills and for issue of NOC for considering the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the conversion of free Shipping Bills into drawback Shipping Bills u/s 149 of Customs Act. It clarified that goods funded by KOICA for...

Cenvat credit - Bill of Entry in the name of the supplier of the raw material i.e. Principal - goods were received by the appellant as a job worker and used in the...

CENVAT Credit - transportation and Toll charges - the appellant is mandatory required to clear the sludge from their factory and for clearance of the said sludge, the...

Valuation - inclusion of profit earned on transportation charges - due to transportation in their own vehicle, manufacturer has earned the profit on account of...

Assessable value – As per Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000, the transportation charges shown separately in the invoice or charge separately are not...

Appellant had close business relationship with kingpin/mastermind, admitted being employee of CHA firm involved in case, facilitated seeking office for mastermind,...

Classification - E-Commerce Operator or not - intends to own, develop an electronic/digital platform for booking of cabs - Appellant is liable to be registered in view...

Customs broker's license revoked, entire security deposit forfeited, penalty levied for contravening Regulations 10(a), 10(b), 10(d), 10(e), 10(f), 10(k) & 10(n) of...

Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for...

Duty Drawback claim rejected for non-Basmati Rice export, appellant argued not filing drawback shipping bill due to reasons beyond control. Tribunal held Commissioner...

Quick Updates: